Skip to content
Hemp Law Watch
Back to North Carolina
No active alertUpdateNorth Carolina

On Aug. 4, the North Carolina House declined to vote on a bill that would ban most hemp THC products; it remains in committee

House Bill 328 would treat products with more than 0.4 milligrams of total THC per container as controlled substances and set an age-21 rule. The Senate approved it 37-6 in July; as of Oct. 17 it was still in the House Rules Committee.

Hemp Law Watch desk3 min readState jurisdictionLog in to save

On Aug. 4, 2026, Republicans in the North Carolina House decided against holding a vote on House Bill 328, legislation that would ban most hemp and THC products in the state, WUNC News reported. The bill, titled "Regulate Hemp-Derived Consumables," remained in the House Rules Committee that evening after it was left off the day's calendar, according to Carolina Journal.

Starting in November, the bill would make any product containing more than 0.4 milligrams of total THC per container a Schedule VI controlled substance, which would make it illegal under the same drug laws governing marijuana, matching pending federal rules, according to WUNC. Carolina Journal reported that the bill would also outlaw products containing synthetic or chemically converted cannabinoids, prohibit the sale or delivery of any hemp-derived consumable product to someone younger than 21, and bar underage possession. Beyond hemp, the legislation would regulate kratom, prohibit synthetic kratom products and add xylazine to the state's Schedule III controlled substances, the outlet reported.

The North Carolina Senate adopted the bill's conference report 37-6 on July 2, according to the General Assembly's bill record. Because conference reports cannot be amended on the House floor, the House must either adopt the agreement, which would send the bill to Gov. Josh Stein, or send it back for more negotiation, Carolina Journal reported. The House had voted 95-18 in April not to accept the Senate's rewrite of the bill, which sent it to a conference committee, according to the bill record.

The decision followed a day of lobbying at the Legislative Building. Hundreds of hemp industry workers and supporters called for the bill to be replaced with regulations requiring buyers to be 21 or older, and some retailers closed their shops and sent employees to the legislature, WUNC reported. A coalition of hemp businesses estimated that the state's hemp industry generates $3.2 billion a year and supports 16,000 jobs, according to Carolina Journal. Dozens of law enforcement officers and prosecutors attended a news conference with several House Republicans in support of the bill, WUNC reported, and seven law enforcement and criminal justice organizations had called the conference report a "high priority" in a July 27 memorandum, according to Carolina Journal.

House Speaker Destin Hall said that while most legislators see a need for hemp regulations, there was "a lot of disagreement about what to do, and concerns about maybe the bill as written is too broad, and so there's just not the time to deal with that while we're in session right now," according to WUNC. He said he planned to appoint a committee to study the issue more closely in the coming months, the outlet reported.

Gov. Stein criticized a separate provision on kratom. "For some reason, the bill also legalizes kratom, an opioid-like substance sometimes called gas station heroin, and fails to include any meaningful age restrictions," Stein said in a social media post, according to WUNC.

Later developments: As of Oct. 17, 2026, the General Assembly's website still listed the bill's last action as a July 30 re-referral to the House Committee on Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House, with no later action recorded. Carolina Journal reported in August that the bill would remain eligible for consideration during the legislature's post-election sessions in November. Separately, Public Law 119-103, a federal funding law signed Sept. 2, delayed most of the new federal hemp restrictions to Dec. 11, 2026.

This report summarizes published reporting and official records and is not legal advice.

Related legal context

Source citation cards

Authorship is reported as a signal for editorial review. Automated checks cannot prove who wrote a document, so every card records what was found and what remains uncertain.

Source 1Source verified

After heavy lobbying, NC House decides against vote on hemp product ban

Publisher
WUNC (North Carolina Public Radio)
Author
Colin Campbell
Published
Aug 4, 2026
Jurisdiction
NC
Severity
No active alert
Retrieval
HTTP 200
Credited authorOpen source

Authorship signal — The article provides a specific byline credit to reporter Colin Campbell.

Source 2Source verified

NC House leaves hemp ban unresolved after dueling pressure campaigns

Publisher
Carolina Journal
Author
Andrew Pomeranz
Published
Aug 5, 2026
Jurisdiction
NC
Severity
No active alert
Retrieval
HTTP 200
Credited authorOpen source

Authorship signal — The article provides a specific byline credit to reporter Andrew Pomeranz.

Source 3Source verified

House Bill 328 (2025-2026 Session): Regulate Hemp-Derived Consumables (bill history)

Publisher
North Carolina General Assembly
Author
North Carolina General Assembly
Published
Oct 17, 2026
Jurisdiction
NC
Severity
No active alert
Retrieval
HTTP 200
Official bodyOpen source

Authorship signal — This is a direct portal for the North Carolina General Assembly legislative records.

Source 4Source verified

Public Law 119-103

Publisher
U.S. Government Publishing Office
Author
U.S. Congress
Published
Sep 2, 2026
Jurisdiction
NC
Severity
No active alert
Retrieval
HTTP 200
Official bodyOpen source

Authorship signal — The document is hosted on the official U.S. government publishing domain.

Discussion

0 comments

Log in to join the discussion. Comments are public and appear with your name.

No comments yet. Be the first to add context.

Hemp Law Watch

A nationwide publication tracking hemp and cannabis law as it changes. Every published report carries its sources, authorship signals and an alert classification.

Sections

Editorial

Alert classifications

  • Federal alert
  • Misdemeanor / ticketable

Hemp Law Watch reports on legal developments and does not provide legal advice. State summaries are editorial reference points reviewed by the desk; always confirm against the cited primary sources.

© 2026 Hemp Law Watch