Skip to content
Hemp Law Watch
Back to Michigan
No active alertUpdateMichigan

On June 4, the Michigan Senate voted 32-0 to repeal the state's industrial hemp grower program and leave hemp regulation to USDA

Senate Bills 608 and 609 would take effect Feb. 1, 2027, if enacted; both have been in the House Regulatory Reform Committee since June 4.

Hemp Law Watch desk2 min readState jurisdictionLog in to save

On June 4, 2026, the Michigan Senate passed Senate Bills 608 and 609 by votes of 32-0, with six senators excused, according to the Michigan Legislature's bill records. Together, the bills would effectively repeal the state's Industrial Hemp Growers Act, which created Michigan's Industrial Hemp Program in 2020, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Senate Fiscal Agency.

Senate Bill 608, sponsored by Sen. Dan Lauwers, would repeal all but one section of the act. Senate Bill 609, sponsored by Sen. John Cherry, would abolish the program's Industrial Hemp Fund on Oct. 1, 2027, and move any unencumbered balance to the Agriculture Licensing and Inspection Fees Fund. The bills would take effect Feb. 1, 2027, the analysis said.

The program is administered by the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (MDARD). According to the analysis, testimony before the Senate Regulatory Affairs Committee indicated there are now fewer than 30 registered hemp growers in the state, and some believe the state's fees discourage farmers from growing hemp. The act sets a $1,250 registration fee, and the analysis said it has been suggested that hemp regulation shift from the state to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which does not charge for registration.

The Senate Fiscal Agency said MDARD reports the fund's projected balance as of Oct. 1, 2026, will be $868,000, and that the state agency would no longer bear the cost of hemp grower regulation. SB 609 would also exempt information that former applicants or participants submitted to MDARD from the Freedom of Information Act, except for disclosure of personal information to law enforcement.

Later developments: Both bills were received by the Michigan House on June 4 and referred to the House Committee on Regulatory Reform. As of Oct. 17, the Legislature's records list no further action on either bill.

This report is not legal advice.

Related legal context

Source citation cards

Authorship is reported as a signal for editorial review. Automated checks cannot prove who wrote a document, so every card records what was found and what remains uncertain.

Source 1Source verified

Industrial Hemp Act; Repeal, S.B. 608 (S-1) & 609 (S-2): Analysis as Passed by the Senate

Publisher
Michigan Legislature
Author
Abby Schneider (legislative analyst); Bruce R. Baker and Elizabeth Raczkowski (fiscal analysts)
Published
Jun 11, 2026
Jurisdiction
MI
Severity
No active alert
Retrieval
HTTP 200
Credited authorOpen source

Authorship signal — The document explicitly credits a specific legislative analyst and fiscal analysts by name.

Source 2Source verified

Senate Bill 608 of 2025 (bill history)

Publisher
Michigan Legislature
Author
Michigan Legislative Service Bureau
Published
Jun 4, 2026
Jurisdiction
MI
Severity
No active alert
Retrieval
HTTP 200
Official bodyOpen source

Authorship signal — The content is published directly by the Michigan Legislature via its Legislative Service Bureau.

Source 3Source verified

Senate Bill 609 of 2025 (bill history)

Publisher
Michigan Legislature
Author
Michigan Legislative Service Bureau
Published
Jun 4, 2026
Jurisdiction
MI
Severity
No active alert
Retrieval
HTTP 200
Official bodyOpen source

Authorship signal — The content is published directly by the Michigan Legislature via its Legislative Service Bureau.

Discussion

0 comments

Log in to join the discussion. Comments are public and appear with your name.

No comments yet. Be the first to add context.

Hemp Law Watch

A nationwide publication tracking hemp and cannabis law as it changes. Every published report carries its sources, authorship signals and an alert classification.

Sections

Editorial

Alert classifications

  • Federal alert
  • Misdemeanor / ticketable

Hemp Law Watch reports on legal developments and does not provide legal advice. State summaries are editorial reference points reviewed by the desk; always confirm against the cited primary sources.

© 2026 Hemp Law Watch